Why I hate folk music.

by johnford on July 14, 2004

Let’s just say I’ve learned to hate it. A pretty perplexing statement for someone with my record collection. In fact what I hate is what it is perceived to be, not necissilarly what it is. To me folk is a somewhat odd mixture of traditional American , mostly from the South played by primitive rural amateurs and contemporary singer songwriters. I know, I know, a pretty broad definition and even somewhat diametrically in opposition. But what most people perceive as folk these days, and indeed since the “great folk boom” of the ’50s and ’60’s, is liberal North Easterners singing real white bread-no crust topical that’s mostly political in nature. That is the folk I have learned to really, really despise.

Contemporary folk (which I’ll call topical for the remainder of this diatribe) gets under my skin the same way that contemporary Christian does. It’s just as dishonest and transparent. Although I am a theist and on top of that, a theist of Christian theological extraction, the whole contemporary Christian thing just makes me want to hurl. Why? Because this form is nothing more than a group of marketers using the guise of to further their religious and political ambitions. These folks making this pabulum that calls itself “Christian ” would be just as happy to use cinema, finger-painting or even porn (if they felt they could get away with it) to further their presuppositions. It’s dishonest and on top of that, most of it is regrettably bad.

Topical folk is stuck in the same reality distortion field as contemporary Christian . Most of the people that find themselves in this musical wasteland, in much the same way that the folks behind modern Christian , are in reality more interested in propagating their political beliefs than they are interested in . In fact, I’d actually argue that most of them aren’t really interested in at all. They’re just using it to further their (usually leftist) political beliefs. Let’s face it, most of this garbage started with the great Northeastern Folk boom. Political activists such as Pete Seger hijacked the of the rural south to use for their own political aims. One thing that I do find interesting about most of the liberal elite that now control the content of what is wrongly called “folk ” have little knowledge of this ’s roots beyond the 1960’s. There is no real knowledge of the rural southern blues or the of the Irish and Scottish immigrants of the Appalachians. Their world view of “folk ” usually begins with Pete Seger, The Kingston Trio or Phil Ochs. In fact, they completely ignore the “secular” works (that is the not of a political nature) of Woody Guthrie or even the new/old poster child of the uber-left folkies, Phil Ochs. Even worse, there is a whole schism of these neo-folkies that don’t have any knowledge of folk musics roots beyond Joni Mitchell or Ani DiFranco.

So in the end what are we left with? A bunch of lunatic neo-socialists using to further their political aims in exactly the same fashion the radical Christian right uses to further their theology. In both cases, much of the is just as counterfeit and corrupt as their morals . The left that’s hijacked this American musical form for their own political gain are just as morally corrupt and dishonest and the Christian right in their adoption of bad pop for their theocratic gain. And this lover is sure buying and listening to a lot of Alt-Country and Americana these days. Why? I’d have to say I love it’s honesty. And in reality, it’s really just folk , without all the baggage and finger pointing.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

{ 3 comments }

1

Anonymous 07.24.04 at 6:45 pm

ru crazy?

2

john ford 07.25.04 at 1:52 am

Yes… pretty much

3

Jim 09.27.04 at 3:19 pm

Yep. That was pretty much of a rant. On the other hand, I think it was pretty much of a hit right in the ol’ ten ring. For myself, I like the seger-mitchell-k trio, whiny 60’s folk/protest music. I like it for the nostalgia. Those barfoot, nasty smelling, tie-dyed goofs made the music of the times. But, along with the music, they were promoting their own agendas. I ignored that then; I ignore it now.

Comments on this entry are closed.