Posts tagged as:

employment

How Not to Lie on Your Resume

by johnford on August 3, 2008

Have you ever stretched the truth on your resume? Maybe just a little? According to the results of a new survey undertaken by careerbuilder.com, more of us have puffed up our that you might think. Just under half of the hiring and HR managers surveyed said they had caught a job candidate lying on a resume, while only eight percent of the job seekers admitted to stretching the truth. Clearly somebody’s not telling the truth here.businessman Martin BOULANGER stockxchange

The survey notes that if you get caught with a little misinformation on your resume, it’s not going to sit well with the hiring manager. Close to 60 percent of the job decision makers said that they would automatically remove the candidate from consideration. Still, if you like to play the odds, fibbing on a resume did work out for some. Six percent of job applicants who are caught lying still land the job.

IT, Healthcare and Transportation job applicants are most likely to fudge the facts on their . 59 percent of Transportation and Utilities Human Resource managers said they found lies on , while 57 percent of Information Technology employers discovered falsities. And here’s a real shocker, applicants applying for jobs in the Government sector appear to have the lowest rate of embellished . Employers in Government reported just 45 percent. Who says you can’t trust a politician.

The most common lies on were amplifying responsibilities and skill sets, dates of and history and academic degrees and job titles. Still, not all of the deceit the hiring managers spotted were just little white lies. The survey asked managers to share some of the most memorable or outrageous lies they had spotted on a resume. Some of the big fat ones included: One applicant who claimed to be a member of the Kennedy Family, claiming to be a member of Mensa, submitting work samples that the interviewer actually did and claiming to be Hispanic when the potential employee was 100 percent Caucasian.

So how can you fill-in in the gaps or make your resume stand out from the crowd without puffing it up with embellishments or even out and out lies? According to Rosemary Haefner, Vice President of Human Resources at CareerBuilder: “Even the slightest embellishment can come back to haunt you and ruin your credibility. Use your cover letter strategically to tell your story, focusing on your strengths and accomplishments and explaining any areas of concern if needed.”

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

{ 2 comments }

Today Apple is a darling, a huge success story. A company that has returned from the ashes and reinvented itself more times than The Trixter has. But it wasn’t that long ago that the un-elected computer intelegencia and the everyday end-user was predicting a quick death for the company that has had more lives than the common cat. It wasn’t just the geeks, the alleged bastions of journalistic integrity such as Fortune, Time and back in ‘95 and ‘96 were writing that was already a dead duck, they just didn’t know it yet.

Hey, I admit it, I’ve been an fanboy for quite a while. Through good times and bad. Having first been introduced to the Mac because of its ease of use as an audio editing workstation. It wasn’t the amazing adds or the slick use of marketing, it was with much resignation and a lot of weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth, I was dragged kicking and screaming into the cult of computing. But once I did, there was no looking back.

In the ’90s times were tough for , very tough. The stock was in the crapper, The Newton was considered a ‘joke,’ (even though it gave rise to the very successful and yes, the . Not to mention the fact that we’ve yet to see what will finally do with the real holy grail of the Newton, Rosetta) month after month the market share was dwindling for . The eminent death of was expected to happen any day, with rumors of Sony, Adobe and yes even Microsoft picking the last remnants of flesh from the once great upstart company. Enter …. In 1997 on his first day on the job, with bleeding money to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, Jobs launched the project that would become the iMac. had already spent 400 million dollars for the purchase of NeXT, and bled countless millions to develop the Newton under Scully. After freezing their research spending in 1996 to about 5 percent, and cutting its workforce by 30 percent in ‘97, started to spend again on R&D with Jobs back in charge. was funding more money into Research and Development than any of its competitors, including IBM and Dell. R&D spending reached over 7% in the early years of the new millennium, even though experienced a few quarters with losses in 2003. Prompting CFO Fred Anderson to make a very remarkable quote: “We’re not going to mortgage the future for short-term profit maximization.” And according to Anderson, was spending nearly a half a billion dollars a year on R&D.

Sure had a few misses in those early years under Jobs. The Cube failed to take off, but this didn’t stop Jobs from pushing ahead in his belief in form factor, something that would later make the iMac a huge hit and arguably the Cube would later be reincarnated as the Mac Mini. And I have to admit, I originally thought the iPod was a joke. Even though I had one of the first iPods, I couldn’t really see beyond the trees of it being “just another mp3 player.” Only now are we starting to see Mr. Jobs real vision of a digital hub and the evil genius of his viral marketing of OSX through iTunes and the iPhone.

So what does all of this have to do with broadcasters? Plenty. Today we find , TV and of course the Print Media being handed much of the same monikers that had to endure back in the ’90s… “beleaguered” and “antiquated.” Advertising spending on is falling just like ’s market share did just a few short years ago. So tightens its belt, hires more salesman to chase the ever decreasing add dollars and cuts the bottom line from its programing departments across the board. Just a few weeks ago the cuts in programming were happening in markets ranging from NYC and LA to Middletown, Ohio. Our product is shrinking, and lets face it, it’s been happening for quite a while now. It sucks ladies and gentleman, but doesn’t hold a death grip on the music biz and audio entertainment anymore. You know it and I know it. It’s been coming down for a long long time.

So what to do chicken little? Let the sky fall? Have a fire sale? Not a chance. is just changing, it’s not dead, dying or on life support, it’s just getting a rectal exam. What we’ve got to do, is do what did. Invest in our “R&D.” Invest in the product. Start ’spending’ money and using our assets to give our users a product to believe in, trust and in turn use more and more. Our customers, the listeners, have to ‘rediscover’ again for what it is… a great and compelling product. If your product becomes ‘beleaguered’ you don’t continue to pretend that everything is fine, and just hire a bigger marketing and sales-force and ’sell the hell out of it.’ (Why am I suddenly reminded of the I’m not dead yet skit.“) It’s a lesson the Detroit automobile manufactures learned, or you would think would have learned in the ’70s. I believe in the power of . It’s great. It once was absolutely amazing and completely compelling. Damn it, that’s why I got into it. It was not only amazingly powerful and a huge social community that really had a tangible and intangible impact on peoples lives, it was fun as hell to be a part of and to listen to. And it can be again. And it’s not rocket science. It’s time for managers and groups to bite the bullet and start investing in our future, or we may not have a very promising future to look forward to. As former CFO Fred Anderson said about his company, We’re not going to mortgage the future for short-term profit maximization. The days of endless double-digit returns every quarter for broadcast investors may be gone and they may never come back. But the long-term forecast is just fine, because we have an amazing product, if we just get back to paying attention to the damn product and nourish and encourage what makes it great… innovative ideas from creative individuals. needs to go back and reinvest in its research bottom line; the product and the talent that is given the environment and encouragement to create and grow a great product.

Oh, and for all the money spent on R&D over the years and all the great products it’s spawned, CEO , the man behind the iPod, , iTunes, iMac, AirBook and all the other gadgets you and yes Sony lust after, remembers another important lesson as well: Innovation has nothing to do with how many R&D dollars you have. When came up with the Mac, IBM was spending at least 100 times more on R&D. It’s not about money. It’s about the people you have, how you’re led, and how much you get it. – Fortune, Nov. 9, 1998.

Get it?!

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

{ 2 comments }

Adventures in unemployment

April 18, 2008

OK, So I’ve been looking for work, for just about six months now. I’m not going to go into great detail about the foibles of who I’ve talked to or what’s transpired. But it has been very interesting. It seems these days, since I’ve been at this radio thing for quite a while now, and [...]

Read the full article →