Posts tagged as:

Mac OSX

Apple MobileMe iPhone Flop

by johnford on August 6, 2008

CEO admits on an internal email that the updated . Internet portal is “not up to ’s standards.”

The memo was posted online at Ars Technica on August 5th and reinforces what and computer users of the new service have been clamoring about since it launched; just isn’t ready for primetime.

was introduced as an update to the old . web portal at the 2008 Developers Conference in June under much fanfare. The service was touted as a companion for the updated 3G with Exchange “push” features that would supply home users with many of the same advantages found on corporate Exchange servers.Steve Jobs on a good day.

Has Been Mobile-Missfire for .

From day one was plagued with issues. For $99.00 a year users were offered features including sync services for their email, contacts, and calendar across their , iPod touch, , and PC devices. Instead the service was plagued with bugs and outages. was frequently unavailable and synchronization was a crapshoot. apologized for the snags and gave subscribers a free 30-day extension.

The Nitty Gritty Memo.

In the memo from Jobs’ the CEO admits that was not up to standards and that the application clearly needed more time and testing. Jobs’ goes on to imply that might have bitten off more than it could chew with the simultaneous / 3G launch, that it “was a mistake to launch at the same time as 3G, 2.0 software and the App Store. We all had more than enough to do, and could have been delayed without consequence.”

Why if You Can Get It for Free?

Many of the . features, originally a free service called “iTools,” introduced at the 2000 Macworld Expo, could be found on the Internet for much less than the price tag of $99.00. Free services such as Gmail, Flickr, Box.net and Google CalDav syncing offered many of the same features available with ., albeit without the tight integration and ease of use . brought to the table.

If wanted to grow their . subscriber base, they had to offer new features to the service and give users a compelling reason to renew and to woo new customers over to the . fold. The Exchange features offered with in tandem with the insanely popular seemed like a home run when the service was introduced at the Developers Conference. Unfortunately the service and bug issues that experienced bred a user backlash is not used to experiencing from its fervent fan-base. The bite so far has proved to be a bitter pill for both and users.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Today Apple is a darling, a huge success story. A company that has returned from the ashes and reinvented itself more times than The Trixter has. But it wasn’t that long ago that the un-elected computer intelegencia and the everyday end-user was predicting a quick death for the company that has had more lives than the common cat. It wasn’t just the geeks, the alleged bastions of journalistic integrity such as Fortune, Time and back in ‘95 and ‘96 were writing that was already a dead duck, they just didn’t know it yet.

Hey, I admit it, I’ve been an fanboy for quite a while. Through good times and bad. Having first been introduced to the because of its ease of use as an audio editing workstation. It wasn’t the amazing adds or the slick use of marketing, it was with much resignation and a lot of weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth, I was dragged kicking and screaming into the cult of computing. But once I did, there was no looking back.

In the ’90s times were tough for , very tough. The stock was in the crapper, The Newton was considered a ‘joke,’ (even though it gave rise to the very successful and yes, the . Not to mention the fact that we’ve yet to see what will finally do with the real holy grail of the Newton, Rosetta) month after month the market share was dwindling for . The eminent death of was expected to happen any day, with rumors of Sony, Adobe and yes even Microsoft picking the last remnants of flesh from the once great upstart company. Enter …. In 1997 on his first day on the job, with bleeding money to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, Jobs launched the project that would become the iMac. had already spent 400 million dollars for the purchase of NeXT, and bled countless millions to develop the Newton under Scully. After freezing their research spending in 1996 to about 5 percent, and cutting its workforce by 30 percent in ‘97, started to spend again on R&D with Jobs back in charge. was funding more money into Research and Development than any of its competitors, including IBM and Dell. R&D spending reached over 7% in the early years of the new millennium, even though experienced a few quarters with losses in 2003. Prompting CFO Fred Anderson to make a very remarkable quote: “We’re not going to mortgage the future for short-term profit maximization.” And according to Anderson, was spending nearly a half a billion dollars a year on R&D.

Sure had a few misses in those early years under Jobs. The Cube failed to take off, but this didn’t stop Jobs from pushing ahead in his belief in form factor, something that would later make the iMac a huge hit and arguably the Cube would later be reincarnated as the Mac Mini. And I have to admit, I originally thought the iPod was a joke. Even though I had one of the first iPods, I couldn’t really see beyond the trees of it being “just another mp3 player.” Only now are we starting to see Mr. Jobs real vision of a digital hub and the evil genius of his viral marketing of OSX through iTunes and the iPhone.

So what does all of this have to do with broadcasters? Plenty. Today we find , TV and of course the Print Media being handed much of the same monikers that had to endure back in the ’90s… “beleaguered” and “antiquated.” Advertising spending on is falling just like ’s market share did just a few short years ago. So tightens its belt, hires more salesman to chase the ever decreasing add dollars and cuts the bottom line from its programing departments across the board. Just a few weeks ago the cuts in programming were happening in markets ranging from NYC and LA to Middletown, Ohio. Our product is shrinking, and lets face it, it’s been happening for quite a while now. It sucks ladies and gentleman, but doesn’t hold a death grip on the music biz and audio entertainment anymore. You know it and I know it. It’s been coming down for a long long time.

So what to do chicken little? Let the sky fall? Have a fire sale? Not a chance. is just changing, it’s not dead, dying or on life support, it’s just getting a rectal exam. What we’ve got to do, is do what did. Invest in our “R&D.” Invest in the product. Start ’spending’ money and using our assets to give our users a product to believe in, trust and in turn use more and more. Our customers, the listeners, have to ‘rediscover’ again for what it is… a great and compelling product. If your product becomes ‘beleaguered’ you don’t continue to pretend that everything is fine, and just hire a bigger marketing and sales-force and ’sell the hell out of it.’ (Why am I suddenly reminded of the I’m not dead yet skit.“) It’s a lesson the Detroit automobile manufactures learned, or you would think would have learned in the ’70s. I believe in the power of . It’s great. It once was absolutely amazing and completely compelling. Damn it, that’s why I got into it. It was not only amazingly powerful and a huge social community that really had a tangible and intangible impact on peoples lives, it was fun as hell to be a part of and to listen to. And it can be again. And it’s not rocket science. It’s time for managers and groups to bite the bullet and start investing in our future, or we may not have a very promising future to look forward to. As former CFO Fred Anderson said about his company, We’re not going to mortgage the future for short-term profit maximization. The days of endless double-digit returns every quarter for broadcast investors may be gone and they may never come back. But the long-term forecast is just fine, because we have an amazing product, if we just get back to paying attention to the damn product and nourish and encourage what makes it great… innovative ideas from creative individuals. needs to go back and reinvest in its research bottom line; the product and the talent that is given the environment and encouragement to create and grow a great product.

Oh, and for all the money spent on R&D over the years and all the great products it’s spawned, CEO , the man behind the iPod, , iTunes, iMac, AirBook and all the other gadgets you and yes Sony lust after, remembers another important lesson as well: Innovation has nothing to do with how many R&D dollars you have. When came up with the , IBM was spending at least 100 times more on R&D. It’s not about money. It’s about the people you have, how you’re led, and how much you get it. - Fortune, Nov. 9, 1998.

Get it?!

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

random thoughts on a monday

by johnford on April 7, 2008

For some reason I clicked over to the Huffington Post this morning. I’m not much for the politic you know, so for the most part I tend to avoid these kind of blogs like a botfly. Oh! Now I remember why I pinged over. The main yahoo news page ‘news.yahoo.com‘ lists the Huffington Post as one of their default . Right. Well anyway, some story caught my eye so I clicked over to HP central. One thing lead to another and I ended up clicking on a story written by Alex Baldwin. Sure he’s kinda cute, if you go for that sort of thing… He’s not a horrible actor. But I gotta’ tell you, and it’s really, really unfortunate, this man can NOT write. It’s almost, well no, I take that back, it is embarrassing, I am honestly embarrassed for him, reading his post. , be what they may, and I don’t give a damn about which side of the cacophony he rests on, His writing is just embarrassingly bad. Don’t get me wrong, I’m no J.D. Salinger, hell I’m not even a O.J. Simpson. But what the hell are they thinking over there at the Huffington Post, if in fact they do! Who is behind editorial. Do they just give their friends jobs or hand out assignments to the cutest talking head because people know their name, or their views fit into Huffington Post cleanly boxed in political world view? I’m sorry, Mr. Baldwin may be a great guy and a hell of an actor, he may be great in the sack or he could even be correct in his political viewpoint…. but he can’t farking write. Instead of writing, maybe he should just stick to voicemail. Was that a cheap shot? Sorry. 

Oh, I’m trying a new bloggin application. Qumana. It’s open source, it’s ‘free’ and It’s ok. If you wanna give it a look, click here. But my favorite application of all time, well at least this week, is WriteRoom.What the hell is that thing? Well, it’s an OSX only application, so sorry Windows users (but I hear a PC application that is very similar is available called DarkRoom). This little app turns your candy, lickable OSX interface into essentially something that looks like an old terminal text editor? Why would you want this? Heh. Well, some folks claim that they love it cause it’s distraction free. Me, I think I like it because it’s just so damn obvious. Unfortunately the ‘newer’ version is $24.95, as opposed to the ‘old’ 1.0 version which was free, as in beer. I’m still using the formerly free version. I just love this silly ass thing, and it’s actually damn usefull. Sooooo…. what is 25 bucks gonna get me? For god’s sake, it’s a little application that turns your vector delicious into a two color terminal text editor. Not sure if the free version is still available. Might wanna do some searching if you fall in love with the 2.0ish demo and just can’t live without it. Or fork over the 24.95, I’m sure the developer is a great guy!

 

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]